Integrated Application Management Suite · European Union
Selection infrastructure for competitive individual awards.
Grinexura runs the whole cycle on one continuous record — application, validation, collaborative review, decision, impact. Scholarships, fellowships and studentships only. Nothing bolted on.
- Applicants stay informed
- Reviewers stay transparent
- Funders stay confident
- 50–70%
- Administrative overhead removed in the first full cycle
- 7–9 → 1
- Disconnected tools replaced by a single record
- 15–25
- Applications before reviewer fatigue — now measured
- 100%
- AI findings cited, overridable and logged
The problem
High administrative cost. Weak integrity signals. Broken feedback loops.
Programme teams
- Seven to nine tools per programme
- Manual scoring in spreadsheets
- Email chasing for missing documents
- Most of the cycle spent on process, not selection
Reviewers
- No shared discussion thread
- No defined windows or reminders
- Fatigue after 15–25 applications
- Score inconsistency nobody can see
Applicants & funders
- Silence after submission
- No visibility on missing items
- Impact reported months later, by hand
- No defensible audit trail
The model
Three layers. One record. Humans decide.
Intelligent intake & validation
Versioned form builder with conditional logic and eligibility rules evaluated at draft and at submit. Documents pass virus scan, type validation and third-party authenticity checks. Applicants see status, missing items and deadlines in real time.
- Smart eligibility rules
- Document verification
- Applicant notifications
Collaborative & integrity review
Weighted rubrics, threaded discussion on the application or a single field, one-click anonymisation, and reviewer windows with automated reminders. Assist surfaces similarity, evidence gaps and score drift — the committee still decides.
- Optional full anonymity
- Windows & reminders
- Score-drift detection
Impact & cost clarity
The record persists after the award. Check-in forms capture outcomes, funder-ready export packages assemble themselves, and every decision carries a reason code inside an immutable audit log.
- Persistent impact record
- Funder audit trail
- Before/after admin metrics
What you get
Faster cycles, clearer windows, stronger integrity.
Integrity by default
Similarity detection, fraud and anomaly checks, document authenticity and evidence-gap tests run on every submission. Findings attach to the record as structured signals — never as a silent score adjustment.
Anonymity you can switch on
Field-level masking follows your policy. Reviewers see the work, not the name, and the audit log records exactly who saw what and when.
One shared discussion
Threaded comments and mentions live next to the scores, so committee reasoning survives the cycle instead of dying in an inbox.
Windows that close on time
Every reviewer gets a defined window and an expected volume. Reminders fire at window start, mid-window and before the deadline. Chairs see progress, overdue items and unassigned applications.
Differentiation
We cut administrative overhead by 50–70%.
Programmes today run seven to nine tools with heavy manual work: spreadsheets, email chasing, PDF wrangling. Reviewer quality drops after 15–25 applications. Consolidating intake, validation, assignment, reminders, discussion and reporting into one system compresses the process overhead that currently consumes the majority of staff time.
We report the before/after administrative-time metric for every client. If the number does not move, the pilot has failed and we say so.
Focused vertical
Scholarships, fellowships and studentships only. No general research grants, no CSR giving platforms.
Integrity as a moat
Similarity checks, fraud signals, document validation and an immutable audit trail are built in, not bolted on.
Operational product
Timelines, assignment windows and reminders attack the actual failure mode: missed reviews and uneven load.
Regulatory tailwind
GDPR, equality duties and funder scrutiny favour transparent, EU-native platforms.
Insights
Field notes on selection practice.
Design partners · French & EU institutions
Run one cycle on Grinexura and measure the difference.
Pilots start with a single programme, your real rubric and your real reviewers. We migrate the forms, you keep the judgement.